Nissan Altima 0-60 times
Autotk.com offers accurate information on Nissan Altima 0-60 times and quarter mile from trusted sources. You may also keep track of how 0-60 times of Nissan Altima changed across years and check out the model’s competitors with the same acceleration performance.
Our mission is to present an easy-to-read and comprehensive information on Nissan Altima 0-60 mph and quarter mile for the devoted geeks, as it is an essential indicator of the vehicle power.
2020 Nissan Altima 0-60 times, all trims
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
2019 Nissan Altima 0-60 times, all trims
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
Car And Driver Results
| Zero to 60 mph | 5.9 sec |
| Zero to 100 mph | 14.7 sec |
| Zero to 130 mph | 28.7 sec |
| Rolling start, 5-60 mph | 6.4 sec |
| Top gear, 30-50 mph | 3.6 sec |
| Top gear, 50-70 mph | 4.1 sec |
| Standing ¼-mile | 14.5 sec @ 99 mph |
| Braking, 70-0 mph | 172 ft |
| Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad | 0.91 g |
2018 Nissan Altima 0-60 times, all trims
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
|
2.5 SR 4dr Sedan 179 Hp, 177 Lb-Ft., 3258 Weight, 26 City / 37 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
5.9 sec, 14.5 @ 97 |
|
3.5 SL 4dr Sedan 270 Hp, 251 Lb-Ft., 3462 Weight, 22 City / 32 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
5.9 sec, 14.5 @ 97 |
|
2.5 SV 4dr Sedan 179 Hp, 177 Lb-Ft., 3233 Weight, 27 City / 38 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
7.5 sec, 16.2 @ 86 |
|
2.5 S 4dr Sedan 179 Hp, 177 Lb-Ft., 3212 Weight, 27 City / 38 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
7.7 sec, 16.2 @ 86 |
|
2.5 SL 4dr Sedan 179 Hp, 177 Lb-Ft., 3254 Weight, 27 City / 38 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
7.7 sec, 16.2 @ 86 |
2017 Nissan Altima 0-60 times, all trims
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
2016 Nissan Altima 0-60 times, all trims
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
|
3.5 SL 4dr Sedan 270 Hp, 251 Lb-Ft., 3463 Weight, 22 City / 32 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
5.9 sec, 14.5 @ 97 |
|
3.5 SR 4dr Sedan 270 Hp, 251 Lb-Ft., 3412 Weight, 22 City / 32 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
5.9 sec, 14.5 @ 97 |
|
2.5 SV 4dr Sedan 182 Hp, 180 Lb-Ft., 3233 Weight, 27 City / 39 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
7.5 sec, 16.2 @ 86 |
|
2.5 4dr Sedan 182 Hp, 180 Lb-Ft., 3197 Weight, 27 City / 39 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
7.7 sec, 16.2 @ 86 |
|
2.5 S 4dr Sedan 182 Hp, 180 Lb-Ft., 3212 Weight, 27 City / 39 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
7.7 sec, 16.2 @ 86 |
|
2.5 SR 4dr Sedan 182 Hp, 180 Lb-Ft., 3258 Weight, 26 City / 37 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
7.7 sec, 16.2 @ 86 |
|
2.5 SL 4dr Sedan 182 Hp, 180 Lb-Ft., 3254 Weight, 27 City / 39 Hwy mpg, Xtronic 2-spd CVT transmission |
7.7 sec, 16.2 @ 86 |
Car And Driver Results
| Zero to 60 mph | 8.2 sec |
| Zero to 100 mph | 22.3 sec |
| Rolling start, 5-60 mph | 8.5 sec |
| Top gear, 30-50 mph | 4.2 sec |
| Top gear, 50-70 mph | 5.6 sec |
| Standing ¼-mile | 16.5 sec @ 87 mph |
| Braking, 70-0 mph | 192 ft |
| Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad | 0.81 g |
Nissan Altima 0-60 mph acceleration across years
| Year of a Model | 0-60 times, Quarter mile |
| 2018 | 5.9 - 7.7 sec, 14.5 @ 97 - 16.2 @ 86 mph |
| 2016 | 5.9 - 7.7 sec, 14.5 @ 97 - 16.2 @ 86 mph |
| 2015 | 5.9 - 7.7 sec, 14.5 @ 100 - 16.2 @ 86 mph |
| 2014 | 5.9 - 7.7 sec, 14.5 @ 97 - 16.2 @ 86 mph |
| 2013 | 5.9 - 7.7 sec, 14.5 @ 97 - 16.2 @ 85 mph |
| 2012 | 5.9 - 7.7 sec, 14.3 @ 97 - 16.1 @ 85 mph |
| 2011 | 5.9 - 7.9 sec, 14.3 @ 97 - 16.2 @ 85 mph |
| 2010 | 5.9 - 7.9 sec, 14.3 @ 97 - 16.2 @ 85 mph |
| 2009 | 5.9 - 7.9 sec, 13.5 @ 102 - 16.2 @ 87 mph |
| 2008 | 5.9 - 7.9 sec, 12.95 @ 103 - 16.1 @ 88 mph |
| 2007 | 5.9 - 7.9 sec, 13.3 @ 104 - 16.1 @ 88 mph |
| 2006 | 5.9 - 7.4 sec, 14.6 @ 97 - 15.9 @ 88 mph |
| 2005 | 5.9 - 7.4 sec, 14.6 @ 97 - 15.9 @ 88 mph |
| 2004 | 6.3 - 8.6 sec, 14.8 @ 96 - 16.5 @ 84 mph |
| 2003 | 6.3 - 8.6 sec, 14.8 @ 96 - 16.5 @ 84 mph |
| 2002 | 6.35 - 7.7 sec, 14.85 @ 0 - 15.9 @ 0 mph |
| 2001 | 8.05 - 9.1 sec, 16.55 @ 0 - 17.8 @ 0 mph |
| 2000 | 8.05 - 9.1 sec, 16.55 @ 0 - 17.6 @ 0 mph |
| 1999 | 8.26 - 9.2 sec, 16.75 @ 0 - 17.7 @ 0 mph |
Nissan Altima competitors' 0-60 mph acceleration
-
Dodge Charger 0-60
- Zero To Sixty 3.4 - 6.4 sec
- Quarter Mile 11.4 @ 128 - 15 @ 97 mph
-
Ford Taurus 0-60
- Zero To Sixty 5.2 - 7.4 sec
- Quarter Mile 13.8 @ 102 - 15.6 @ 91 mph
-
Honda Accord 0-60
- Zero To Sixty 5.9 - 7.6 sec
- Quarter Mile 14.4 @ 98 - 15.9 @ 89 mph
-
Mercedes-Benz CLA-Class 0-60
- Zero To Sixty 6.1 - 6.3 sec
- Quarter Mile 14.8 @ 95 - 14.9 @ 94 mph
-
Toyota Camry 0-60
- Zero To Sixty 6.1 - 7.5 sec
- Quarter Mile 14.5 @ 98 - 15.9 @ 90 mph
-
Chrysler 200 0-60
- Zero To Sixty 6.3 - 8.4 sec
- Quarter Mile 14.7 @ 95 - 16.6 @ 85 mph
-
Chevrolet Malibu Limited 0-60
- Zero To Sixty 6.8 sec
- Quarter Mile 15.4 @ 95 mph
-
Mazda Mazda6 0-60
- Zero To Sixty 7.4 sec
- Quarter Mile 15.8 @ 89 mph
The Nissan Altima hasn’t become the driver’s darling like other models the Japanese brand has put out in recent years, but that doesn’t mean it has nothing to offer. Depending on the trim, you get a 179hp 2.5-liter 4-cylinder or a 270hp 3.5-liter V-6, which is more than enough for urban driving. It features a top speed of 121 mph and a 0-60 acceleration in 8.2 seconds, but it does have some reported problems. Mainly, the engine doesn’t run as quietly as one could wish, and the vibration could be a little too strong for your taste. However, there are also big advantages for this design, such as the excellent performance of 38 mpg.
Another common complaint about this model is the CVT. It is well known that not all drivers are CVT-enthusiasts, and even if many Japanese brands usually offer the buyer the choice between CVT and standard automatic transmissions, it is not the case with the Altima. Luckily, the latest models Nissan has put out have improved a lot, so much, so that standard shift ratios sometimes mimic automatic or even manual transmissions.
Another aspect of the Altima that has improved over the years is the handling. The steering is accurate and easy-going, although it is a little lacking in quick response and off-center turning. The shock absorbers and springs absorb much of the vibration transmitted from the wheels, and SR Altimas offer upgrades such as a damper tuning and anti-sway bars. Sharp turns are safer and easier thanks to the understeer control system that helps control the front wheels.
Regarding the brakes, the Altima provides a great response from the pedal and efficient performance. Also, it has incorporated an emergency brake system that automatically stops the car when an imminent collision is detected.
But enough about engine and control specs, what does the Nissan Altima look like? It has changed its outside design quite drastically even since the first models came out into the market. From the very beginning, the look causes a good impression. The hood has curvy and strong lines, the front fenders have been updated, and the front features a wider grille. The trunk lid and the taillights have also been redesigned to match the new feel of the Altima, and both front and back feature renewed bumpers. Its design somewhat resembles other Nissan models such as Altima, as well as similar cars from other brands, to be honest.
The inside of the car is very comfortable and wide enough for the passengers to enjoy the ride. There are no big highlights on the dashboard or upholstery features, except perhaps the control screen with both Android Auto and Apple CarPlay software platforms available, and the remarkable console storage.
